Sure you do. It was just last year in 2018.
Well, those days seem to be over and while the commission meetings are less dramatically entertaining, they are more effective.
Highlights From Last Night In No Particular Order
7904 West Drive The Problem Child of Harbor Island is growing up and settling down.
Breaking the Logjam |
Going through the history of this benighted building is like unraveling a divorce, complicated and not that constructive, so I'll give you the short view.
For over a decade, a dispute about parking has caused enormous repercussions. Year after year, the owners lost value as the argument between the parking lot landlord and the building association dragged on. Every Village effort to help seemed to make it worse.
Last night was a breakthrough. The solution for parking, a result of hard work and a willingness to compromise was brought forth and passed.
It's far from perfect and will need a lot of ongoing work but the combination of a professional legal staff, a professional village management staff, a willing commission unswayed by nihilistic lobbyists and an owner's association willing to work with the village broke the logjam and now the building and the Village can move forward.
It's far from perfect and will need a lot of ongoing work but the combination of a professional legal staff, a professional village management staff, a willing commission unswayed by nihilistic lobbyists and an owner's association willing to work with the village broke the logjam and now the building and the Village can move forward.
The Commission Fixes The Boards
Not These Boards |
The Boards are still emerging. In a nutshell, the purpose of the boards is to advise the commission on issues and policies throughout the Village. They expand the ability of the commission to study issues in detail and take advantage of volunteer citizen expertise by appointing members of the community to the advisory boards.
Under the previous administration, the Boards like everything else were just wastes of time masquerading as civic engagement. Their recommendations were routinely ignored and under the ragged commission had no real purpose. In fact, the previous mayor supported by the faux commissioners went so far as to defend appointing a now convicted fraudster to several boards for reasons.
Last night, there was an Omnibus Ordinance to fix the boards. It regularizes the terms and legal status of the boards and changes the way boards are formed. It's a simple professional fix that a messy previous administration could not even conceive of.
In fact, the changes were so obvious that the three useful commissioners on the dais, Latham, Strout and Wilmoth, seemed to have hard time understanding how the chaotic situation got there in the first place. Fixing it was an easy decision.
But there were two points of disagreement with the proposed ordinance:
Quick opinion: I loved this process. Many of the current board members disagreed with the proposal to change the appointment mechanism while the Village Manager strongly supported it, both for good reasons. The commission clearly listened to each viewpoint, made a decision on what they believe is right for the Village and themselves and moved forward. If in the future it turns out there was a better approach, it can be changed. This is such a refreshing change from the insanity of the previous commission with their "Win the Battle, Lose the War" insanity.
For years, the public was allowed to speak on subjects not on the agenda as a way to call the commission's attention to issues that matter to the resident. And they had 3 minutes.
Now under the previous mayor, this was a time when she would pointedly and rudely ignore the constituent while scribbling imaginary notes. In fact, it got so bad that she was cutting off residents who were bringing their concerns forward because she found it annoying.
Now the Good And Welfare presentations range from concise and useful, through rambling and unfocused, and occasionally just weird, but they are an integral part of our North Bay Village process and a time that matters. That other cities have stricter or shorter requirements reflects badly on them, not us.
Last night the commission restored the 3 minute time frame. This was a good move.
Under the previous administration, the Boards like everything else were just wastes of time masquerading as civic engagement. Their recommendations were routinely ignored and under the ragged commission had no real purpose. In fact, the previous mayor supported by the faux commissioners went so far as to defend appointing a now convicted fraudster to several boards for reasons.
Last night, there was an Omnibus Ordinance to fix the boards. It regularizes the terms and legal status of the boards and changes the way boards are formed. It's a simple professional fix that a messy previous administration could not even conceive of.
In fact, the changes were so obvious that the three useful commissioners on the dais, Latham, Strout and Wilmoth, seemed to have hard time understanding how the chaotic situation got there in the first place. Fixing it was an easy decision.
But there were two points of disagreement with the proposed ordinance:
- The Ordinance would have changed the way board members are selected from a consensus vote to a single appointment per commissioner. The Commission wisely decided to not change the selection process as the current one seems to be working well and let's face it, there are 7 boards and it's hard to imagine that the two useless members even know 7 people. The Ordinance was amended to maintain the current process.
- The Ordinance would also have restricted a citizen from belonging to more than one board. The commission had issues with this since there are two good sides to the argument.
On one side, you don't want to exclude eager citizen volunteers from contributing but on the other, it tends to narrow the view and availability of candidates.
Quick opinion: I loved this process. Many of the current board members disagreed with the proposal to change the appointment mechanism while the Village Manager strongly supported it, both for good reasons. The commission clearly listened to each viewpoint, made a decision on what they believe is right for the Village and themselves and moved forward. If in the future it turns out there was a better approach, it can be changed. This is such a refreshing change from the insanity of the previous commission with their "Win the Battle, Lose the War" insanity.
The Commission Listens
In a move nobody remembers making, the commission changed the rules on the public speaking during the badly named "Open Forum", previously much more eloquently called "Good And Welfare". For some reason it was changed to 2 minutes.
For years, the public was allowed to speak on subjects not on the agenda as a way to call the commission's attention to issues that matter to the resident. And they had 3 minutes.
Now under the previous mayor, this was a time when she would pointedly and rudely ignore the constituent while scribbling imaginary notes. In fact, it got so bad that she was cutting off residents who were bringing their concerns forward because she found it annoying.
Now the Good And Welfare presentations range from concise and useful, through rambling and unfocused, and occasionally just weird, but they are an integral part of our North Bay Village process and a time that matters. That other cities have stricter or shorter requirements reflects badly on them, not us.
Last night the commission restored the 3 minute time frame. This was a good move.
Financial Resilience
An emerging term in government finance is "Financial Resiliency" and the Vice Chair of the Budget Oversight Board, James Rosenberg, who is retired from a long and distinguished career in government finance and audit, discussed the concept with the commission, highlighting several concerns about the Village budgeting process and the need for outcome/performance measures, along with a misunderstanding about the need to borrow money to finance the street repavement.
As usually happens with a complex professional opinion, there is a lot of time required and making observations as bullet points does not serve well. This stuff is hard to understand.
The commission listened carefully, sometimes not quite getting it, other times disagreeing, and other times calling for more information. The upshot is that the commission has asked the board and the administration to study this more closely and bring back their recommendations.
It matters. We don't know what the future holds and we have to have an agile plan in place. It seems like there is one but if the commission doesn't understand how, they cannot move as needed.
Equal Rights Extended To Contractors
I should call this one "Promises Kept." Many people find it surprising that Florida still allows an employer to fire or not hire someone simply because they are LGBT. And there is no federal protection. And it happens.
Last year, Mayoral Candidate (now mayor) Brent Latham made a promise that he would bring legislation to require North Bay Village contractors to explicitly adhere to the North Bay Village Charter protections as laid out in Section 9.03 of our Charter.
Last night, he delivered and the commission unanimously voted to approve this measure.
So simple yet the previous mayor, while taking money and support from now discredited SAVE director, Tony Lima, would not consider any such legislation. Further, our previous Village Attorney, Norman Powell, did not include this in his proposed contract in February of 2018. It matters to North Bay Village and I'm glad it matters to our commission.
Brian Scott Oppenheim - March 2, 1953 September 14, 2019
The commission, led by the police department, honored the late Brian Oppenheim for his consistent and generous philanthropy on behalf of North Bay Village kids. His mother accepted the posthumous honor. A woman of 97 who had suffered the most unnatural grief in the world of losing a child was there to graciously accept the honor. It was a proud moment for all.
And this seems like a good place to stop.
Happy Holidays One and All!
Kevin Vericker
December 10, 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are available to all but you must have a name and a contact. If your comment contains either foul language or slanders against individuals, it will be deleted.